Wherefore Art Though, Water Bond?

This week our elected officials in the State Capitol once again played kick-the-can on one of the biggest issues facing our state:  the future of our water supply.  There had been hopes that politicians could cobble together a bond proposal to put before voters in the November election that would address most or all of the many issues related to water:  upgrading aging infrastructure, building new storage, improving conservation, and protecting wildlife.  The latest proposal appears to have failed.

There were many political obstacles to overcome.  Some environmentalists are opposed to building new water storage, for example.  And many people in Northern California are firmly opposed to Governor Brown’s plan to build giant tunnels through the Delta to ship more water to the south.

But the biggest problem was probably that revealed by several polls this spring: a majority of Californians don’t believe there is a problem and thus professed unwillingness to vote for the state to borrow money for a water bond.  Across party lines, most Californians general attitude is:  “I have plenty of water in my house.  What’s the problem?”.

I have written before about how seriously Southern California water agencies, particularly LA’s Metropolitan Water District (MWD) has taken this issue and how aggressive they have been in building new reservoirs, buying water rights, and paying for conservation technology.  Since a large percentage of Californians live there, they are perhaps justified in not wanting to participate in a statewide effort.  After all, while Northern California was pretending that drought would never happen again, SoCal was busy securing a permanent, drought-proof water supply.

I don’t have any answers to the water crisis confronting our state, but I know that we can’t keep increasing the burden on the existing system and expecting it not to collapse.  The state government is the only institution that can guarantee that everyone who needs water — average people as well as farmers and fish — gets it.  Water is not a partisan issue, and our leaders need to step up and forge a compromise that everyone can live with.

There is still time.




The Sad Tale of the Confused Onions

Most vegetables go through a series of life stages including vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting and senescence (aka, “death”). Our goal as humans — farmers, gardeners, and eaters — is generally to succeed in growing them until they produce the part … Continue reading

Tariffs and Tomatoes

If you’re paying attention to trade policy at all, you’ve probably heard that the Trump Administration is threatening to raise tariffs on Friday on a large part of the exports that China sends us, again. This news caused the stock … Continue reading

CSA and Climate Change

There’s a lengthy series in the New York Times this week about farming and climate change that includes a “How-to” guide for consumers to reduce the carbon footprint of their diet. I would guess that most TFF subscribers are already … Continue reading